http://blogs.examiner.co.uk/moviesfilmscinema/

Does 'Taxi Driver' Need A Sequel?

By Brogan Morris on Feb 19, 10 02:08 PM

Most news about upcoming movies just passes by without registering any kind of emotion out of me. 'Five more superhero movies on their way!' Oh, really. 'Big news - yet another horror film is being remade badly - again!' That's nice. 'Steven Soderbergh has another movie in the works, bringing his total to 16!' Whatever Soderbergh, like that's a surprise, you make about five films a year.

Then, sometimes...just sometimes...a piece of movie news will stand out. This week, I was blessed with such a piece.

'This just in - Martin Scorsese and Lars Von Trier team up!' The greatest living director working alongside the talented and notoriously nutty Von Trier? How interesting... 'The two are in talks to direct a crime movie together!' A crime movie co-directed by Scorsese, who made the gangster pic' what it is today, and Von Trier, the man who is legendary for his unique experimental work? This could be something brilliant! 'Robert De Niro will be starring, working with Scorsese again after more than a decade!' Wow, the finest actor-director partnership in movie history back together once more, where do I sign up?! 'It's a sequel to Taxi Driver!' WHAT?

Taxi_Driver.jpg

Robert De Niro as New York cabbie Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver

Taxi Driver, possibly Martin Scorsese's finest film, is the 1976 masterpiece that tells the story of disillusioned Vietnam vet' Travis Bickle (Robert De Niro, in perhaps his best performance). Living out a lonely existence in New York, insomniac Bickle decides to get a job as a taxi driver. Cruising the streets at night, Bickle begins to increasingly lose a grip on his sanity, developing dangerous obsessions with an underage prostitute (Jodie Foster), a glamorous campaign worker (Cybill Shepherd) and a charismatic senator (Leonard Harris).

There are many films out there that are just begging for a sequel - Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World, with its barely-explored gallery of characters and open ending, demands follow-ups (come on Peter Weir, sort it out man).

There are those that are simply produced with sequels in mind - Transformers, Shrek, Ice Age, you name it, there have been plenty of them.

Then there are those that just need tying up with more movies - The Bourne Identity was originally designed to be its own single movie, but there were one or two loose ends at the climax that its superior sequels managed to tie up nicely.

Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver does not qualify for any of these.

taxi driver 2.jpg

De Niro and Scorsese together on set

For one, what do most movie sequels share in common? They're nearly all family movies. The ultra-violent, difficult Taxi Driver is not family fare, not unless your family is the Manson clan.

In comparison, something child-friendly and light is perfect sequel material; Star Wars, for example, has a simple plot and a cute and cuddly cast of characters, including two squabbling robots and a ten foot raccoon named Chewbacca. If you're looking for cute and cuddly in Taxi Driver, unless you consider a deranged homicidal cabbie or a drug-addled pimp cute and cuddly, you won't find it. There is nothing in Taxi Driver primed for family viewing.

Still, there have been plenty of sequels to more mature movies. Just because straightforward family films are easier to follow up with more movies doesn't mean an adult movie, with careful preparation, can't be.

No, the biggest issue here is that Taxi Driver is a standalone masterpiece - it works perfectly well as it is, and making a sequel, if it turns out poor, would simply soil the original's reputation. Anyone who says it wouldn't has obviously just forcibly erased The Godfather: Part Three from their memory.

taxi-driver.jpg

Robert De Niro, sporting his finest ever haircut as Bickle

What's more, too much time has passed - nearly 35 years - from the original's release. A great story could be crafted from Travis Bickle's life in the modern day and how the events of Taxi Driver affected him in his life and a great film could be made from it - if this was the '70s. Films like Taxi Driver, a product of the freedom, maturity and boldness of 1970s moviemaking, just don't get made today and a sequel would only reflect the sad reality of it. Mainstream filmmaking today just isn't daring enough to make a justifiable follow up to Taxi Driver, purely because daring doesn't make money (or get funded in the first place). Only if a sequel would complement the original Taxi Driver by offering similarities in style and content would Taxi Driver be done any justice. As this is about as likely in today's environment as Scorsese giving back his Oscar, I see a return to the world of Taxi Driver as a bad idea.

I can only hope it slips Scorsese's mind, turns out to be a rumour or, if it comes down to it, I hope the studios decide not to fund it, realising that the sequel to such a cult film would only bomb at the box office anyway.

Do the right thing, Scorsese, and let Travis Bickle rest in peace.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Does 'Taxi Driver' Need A Sequel?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.examiner.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt435/mt-tb.cgi/192242

14 Comments

yo great blog yea nice job our blog review newspaper will soon be adding reviews on blogs and add them to our as the top best 50 blogs to visit we also do reviews on Customer Reviews all types of product reviews go here

Thank you for the article, your blog looks cool! I've wanted to watch Where the Wild Things Are since it came out but I haven't had the chance yet. This absolutely made me want to see it even more!

AHH, I really reading this. This is enthrawling content!

Korey Giese said:

Hi there I have discovered your website while on the search for for something else and seriously like your website.

Thea Shadle said:

I located your blog page and wanted to convey that I have genuinely enjoyed studying your weblog posts.Many thanks for sharing this information ,I truly appreciate reading it.

Fran Delay said:

I truly enjoyed the write-up. It proved being Incredibly very helpful to me and I'm certain to every one of the commentators here!

Kazuko Shand said:

I Never knew that. Thanks to the info. I believe your blog is heading to accomplish well. Folks will generally return to study this kind of content material.Excellent occupation.

Dorthey Fino said:

This is fascinating! How did you learn this stuff when you were a newcomer to it?

Prepared to state, that in all the time I've spent using the web, searching personal blogs, I’ve never read one as short and snappy and well crafted as this one, I do not by and large comment on weblogs although in your case I felt the need to make an exception, this really is really superior work and utterly opposite to the drivel, which i spend virtually all of my time online, reading. Thanks a lot with regard to spending some time and expending your effort to present your readers with a first class report. I look forward to reading a great deal more of your work, yet again thanks. Julie

Merry Jost said:

Need to say, that out of all time I've spent using the web, browsing blogs, forums, I’ve never read one as succinct and well crafted as this one, I do not often comment on personal blogs yet in your case I felt the need to make an exception, this is genuinely very good work and completely opposite to the drivel, which i spend the vast majority of my time on the web, reading. Thank you regarding taking a few minutes and expending the effort to present your readers with a first class write-up. I count on reading a whole lot more of your work, again thanks. Deirdre

Bobbie Anter said:

Cheers for the posting guy, are you a professional. I think you is. Many thanks, Shelly

Keep up to date

Sponsored Links